134
■Bio-mathematics, Statistics and Nano-Technologies: Mosquito Control Strategies
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0
20
40
60
80
100
•
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0
20
40
60
80
100
•
qb
qν
β
qb
qν
β
Figure 6.8: Bifurcation diagram of the SIRqVM model (6.15) for the transcritical bifurca-
tion TC fixed by βνTC (6.17) in the three-parameter (qb,pν,β)-space. The dot • marks the
parameter values qb = 1.0 and qν = 1.0 used in Figure 6.9.
chances of disease eradication. The endemic equilibrium E∗reads:
S∗= N(µqbϑ+2νγ +2νµ)
qbϑ(β +µ)
,
I∗= Nµ(βqbϑ−2νγ −2νµ)
qbϑ(β +µ)(2γ +2µ)
,
(6.18a)
V ∗= µM∞(βqbϑ−2νγ −2νµ)
qvβ(µqbϑ+2νγ +2νµ) ,
M∗= M∞
qν
.
(6.18b)
6.5.2.2
Sensitivity analysis of the SIRqVM model
Similar to the analysis for vaccination controls, we give bifurcation diagrams for the
two control parameters qb and qν where (6.17) implies
qbTC = 2(γ +µ)ν
βϑ
.
We start with an increase of the mortality of vector population modelled in (6.15) with qb =
1 and qν = 1 and whereby 0 ≤β ≤104 is varied. The bifurcation diagram for parameter β is
shown in Figure 6.9. The transcritical bifurcation occurs at βνTC = 52.02. This means that
due to the control measures the system becomes endemic at a much higher rate of infection
β than in the original case without any control shown in Figure 6.5 where βTC = 26.02.
The numerical bifurcation results for the control parameter qb in Figure 6.10 show that
there is a critical vector control threshold value qb equal to the threshold parameter value
at the transcritical bifurcation TC.